Who Should Be Responsible When an 18-year-old College Student Drinks Too Much?

In my not-so-humble opinion, 18-year-old drinkers  should be responsible both their actions and injuries after they drink, even when they are served by older students.

42% of college students reported binge drinking in a 2001 survey. I don’t believe it. This must be a  made-up statistic because my own personal estimate  is that when bible colleges are excluded, approximately 83.7% of American college students binge drink on a semi-regular basis.


Beer bongs, shot-gunning, and keg stands are the standards for drinking for the 15-20 year-old crowd because they are theoretically more palatable ways to drink cheap beer and each of the methods gets you drunk quickly.


I was 18 the first time I did a beer bong and hardly noticed as three frothy keg cups of a Shlitz-like-beer were poured down my throat in 3.7 seconds flat as an impressive-looking senior held the funnel up in the air for me. I then left the party in a fog, went to my dorm-room where my roommate unceremoniously handed me my coat, and told me to go for a walk to sober up.  I did not attempt to do a keg stand at this time.

Once home, I hit my unsuspecting and stone-cold sober roomie on accident with my arms, unintentionally giving her a fat lip.  Her boyfriend, who in my opinion had been with her exactly three weeks too long during the space of their four week relationship, then offered to take me for a walk. I had no interest in him as a boyfriend, but I did manage to tell him in no uncertain terms why he was too good for my roommate. This was later translated by her to mean that I stole her boyfriend.


He and I wandered up to his dorm floor, where I am told I took four shots of whiskey, which may or may not have been true, then I went to my dorm room and threw up, and unceremoniously passed out, having experienced my first black-out.


I was 18 years old at the time. Everyone who gave me alcohol was 21 or over. As an adult, I’m wondering who would have been responsible if I had (possibly while walking around dissing my roommate to her boyfriend), fallen down the stairs and broken my neck. Would it have been the cute senior trying to get me drunk at the first party who gave me the  beer bong? Or would it be the owners of that particular apartment or the strange girl who reportedly gave me the shots of Whiskey?


Or could my roommate have prosecuted me for assault charges for her fat lip which was a complete and total accident?

Shake It Up with Wedding Cocktails

Everyone knows weddings are supposed to be toasted with gallons of bubbly Champagne. But let’s face it, it’s not the cheapest of drinks. Especially when you are footing the bill. What if you don’t like Champagne, or if you don’t drink? Instead of serving up glasses of bubbly, why not try cocktails? The great thing about cocktails is there is a mix for every season and every mood, and they do not even need to be alcoholic. Plus they are a lot cheaper than traditional Champagne- What could be better?

Hot Weddings


These cocktails are light and refreshing. Perfect served over ice for sunny, warm weddings to cool you down.

Lemon Pie


This lemon flavored cocktail is the perfect treat for a zesty, citrus boost.

You will need:
1 bottle of vanilla vodka (750 ml)
1 bottle of Limoncello (375 ml)
1/2 bottle of lemon-lime soda or to taste
1 can of lemonade concentrate

How to make it:
1. Pour the Limoncello into a punchbowl.
2. Pour the lemonade into the bowl.
3. Add the vodka.
4. Place ice in a glass and pour the drink over the ice.
5. Finish off with a little soda.

Minty Magic


Another vodka-based cocktail with a minty taste. Perfect for keeping cool on sunny afternoons.

You will need:
3 whole mint leaves
Lime wedge
Ice
25ml of vodka

How to make it:
1. Place the mint leaves in a cocktail shaker.
2. Add lime juice by squeezing the wedge.
3. Add vodka and ice.
4. Shake it up!
5. Serve with a mint garnish.

For the children and drivers, try this delicious mocktails. They are just as delicious and refreshing but without a drop of alcohol.

Gentle Sea Breeze


This fruity mocktail is a refreshing, juicy treat.

You will need:
100ml cranberry juice
100ml grapefruit juice

How to make it:
1. Pour both juices into a mixer.
2. Shake until frothy.
3. Pour over ice.

Cool Weddings


When the temperature drops, try these cocktails to warm up your tastebuds.

Caribbean Coffee


This creamy decadent cocktail is perfect for cold weather weddings.

You will need:
30ml dark rum
15ml Kahlua
15ml Bailey’s
Coffee

How to make it:
1. Pour the Bailey’s into a coffee mug.
2. Add the Kahlua and rum.
3. Top up with coffee.
4. Stir.
5. Serve with a swirl of whipped cream.

Snowy Day


This warm drink is a twist on a Christmas classic.

You will need:
120ml eggnog
15ml white chocolate liquor
30ml Southern Comfort
Chocolate flakes

How to make it:
1. Pour the eggnog into a glass.
2. Add the liquor and Southern Comfort.
3. Stir until mixed.
4. Garnish with chocolate flakes.

Or how about this alcohol free suggestion?

Cinnamon Hug


This spicy drink is ideal for warming you up on frosty days.

You will need:
450ml apricot nectar
450ml apple juice
900ml cinnamon tea
4 cinnamon sticks
Ground cinnamon

How to make it:
1. Simmer the apricot nectar, apple juice and cinnamon sticks together for 5 minutes.
2. Take pan off the hob and remove the cinnamon sticks.
3. Add cinnamon tea.
4. Garnish with ground cinnamon.
5. Serve in a tea cup.

For a real treat, why not hire someone to shake the cocktails in front of you? They can perform great feats with the cocktail shakers to create fantastic visual displays- a brilliant form of entertainment! They work at all weddings but are particularly interesting at Las Vegas or James Bond themed weddings.

Cocktails make perfect wedding drinks. They’re something different from boring old Champagne- not to mention much cheaper too.



Is Pabst Blue Ribbon the New King of Beers?

After returning last year to Seattle after a long absence, I realized that my understanding of Seattleites has changed. They do not drink beer the way they used to. For much of the 90's, Seattle was known as a great micro-brew town, but has evolved into something completely different. Now, Seattle is a strange mix of people drinking exclusively micro-brews, gluten-free beers which are even available at Seattle's stadiums, and cheap-ass brewskis with Pabst Blue Ribbons leading the pack.

Pabst Blue Ribbon, as far as I know, has no relation in its roots to Seattle and instead owes its roots to the Milwakee home-town of Laverne, Shirley, Squiggy, and Lenny. Yet, every bar I go to (and this will give you some indication about the kinds of bars I frequent), there are Pabst Blue Ribbon tall-boy specials. What's up with that? The beer is on par with Budweiser or Coors and possibly Keystone, but has become the drink of choice for the hipsters that populate the streets in both Seattle and Vancouver.

Is this new loyalty the result of the King of Beers, the standard of "American beer", having sold its soul and its label to a Belgian brewing company or is it instead the result of a clever marketing campaign by Pabst to garner the support of the youth? According to Wikipedia, my ultimate source in information that may or may not be true, Pabst is no longer the small-time brewing company that it was- its now owned by a Los Angeles company. In a rather unusual sponsorship, Pabst agreed to be the official sponsor of an unofficial fraternity at Oregon State University. As a result of the sponsorship, the lucky fraternity guys at the fraternity got a lot of free merchandise, but unfortunately not a drop of free beer. No word on whether Pabst will sponsor Lambda Lambda Lambda frat of Revenge of the Nerds fame as well.

I first became a fan of Pabst in Milwaukee which is a better city than I thought it was and is known for its cheap beer specials. The best deal in town when I was there was a shot of Jamieson, followed by a Pabst Blue Ribbon chaser, and a Marlboro to finish things off. I heard there's something similar in Seattle, but here the cost is around $11 and in Milwaukee the cost was $3, which is hard to beat.

Coke Apologist Apologizes For Coke

In a move that surprises no one, the Wall Street Journal is carrying an op-ed piece which is favorable to a large multinational corporation.  The article in question is a defense of Coke by the CEO of the Coca-Cola company, and he wants you to know that the proposed tax on sugary sodas will not work, and will maybe break the entire country and also make puppies sad.  You don't want puppies to be sad, do you?  I didn't think so!

The CEO of Coca-Cola has a good point, which is that legislating behavior - particularly eating behavior - is probably doomed to failure, and possibly anti-American.  But he's a little disingenuous about the deal with the proposed soda tax.

The first thing about this tax is that it's a sin tax.  We as a country tax things deemed "sinful" more heavily than, say, carrots.  For example, taxes are very high on both cigarettes and alcohol. These are products which are undeniably bad for you.  They are also products which are discretionary purchases. (Although having quit smoking only a few months ago, I will forgive you for protesting that cigarettes aren't "discretionary" any more than heroin is discretionary for a junkie.  But let us agree that no one NEEDS cigarettes in order to continue to exist, the same way that we NEED water, air, and so forth.)

Are sugary sodas like Coke and Pepsi both discretionary and undeniably bad for you?  Yes on both counts.  In fact, in racing to Coke's defense, Mr. Kent can only say that "Even soft drinks with sugar, like Coca-Cola, contain no more calories (140 calories in a can) than some common snacks, breakfast foods and most desserts served up daily in millions of American homes."  I literally stopped and laughed out loud at that line.  Saying that your product is "no worse than a Twinkie" or "no worse than a sack of Oreos"?  Really?  That's what you're going with?  Okay.  

I am reminded of the state of Idaho's license plate slogan, "Famous Potatoes."  If that's the best you've got, then I am really really sorry.

The second thing about this tax is that it is an attempt to use economics to influence behavior.  Time after time we have found that economic theory can solve problems faster, and more completely, than any other method.  It can be shown over and over that cash money is the only thing that motivates people to make changes.  When Canada tripled the cost of a pack of cigarettes, the smoking rate went down by a third.  When gas prices go up, people suddenly don't want to buy SUVs.  Let's face it; money talks.

Now, Mr. Coke does have an excellent point, which is that sugary sodas are probably not the greatest contributor to our increased daily caloric intake.  Most people place that blame at the feet of perfectly normal foods which somehow now contain high fructose corn syrup for no earthly reason.

However, were we to institute a steep tax on everything that contained HFCS, I'm sure the manufacturers of Wheat Thins would make the same protest as Mr. Coke.  "It's difficult to understand why the beverages we and others provide are being targeted as the primary cause of weight gain when 94.5% of caloric intake comes from other foods and beverages," Mr. Coke says. As does every other manufacturer.  This is a collective problem, and sadly, Coke is part of that collective.

The Not-So Perfect Toast

My old roommates who hailed from the red state of Wyoming could drink almost anyone under the table. Not only did they come from a land of good beef and beautiful mountains, they came from a land of drive-through liquor stores. (Great idea, huh?)

They taught me drinking games galore and my very favorite toast in the entire world. I don't recommend using it at weddings or funerals, but among friends with a good sense of humor, it is a definite crowd-pleaser.

 

Here's to you, and here's to me.

Best of Friends We'll Always Be.

And if We Ever Disagree,

F*&%@ You, Here's to Me.

 

Gluten-free Beer at Qwest Field

When I went to Qwest Field the other day, they had added another beer to their list of beers on tap-it was specifically called "Gluten Free beer". I was dubious to say the least. This was the same stand where popcorn, hot dogs, and nachos with orange-yellow microwaved cheese were sold at a venue where people brutally attack each other on the football field. What was going on?


My first  conclusion was that this is Seattle, where not only are the health-nuts catered to, the healthy-drinkers are catered to as well. At my friendly neighborhoood convenience store down the street, when I was searching for a six-pack of brewski, I found not one, but two organic beers for sale. The store also had a small selection of organic budget-friendly wines, which gave me considerably smaller hangovers. Even after my foray into the organic selections in my neighborhood, I still remained curious about gluten-free beers.

My intense research into the "Gluten-Free Beer" mystery yielded some interesting results. Gluten intolerance is caused by Celiac Disease, which is known to cause intestinal damage and affects approximately 2 million people.  That is unfortunate for the beer-drinkers with Celiac disease because Gluten is a protein found in many of the grains used to make  beers. Gluten is also a problem for people who have the misfortune to suffer from Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

As you know, traditionally beers are brewed with barley and hops. However, in an effort to make beer that is without Gluten, sorghum and buckwheat are often substituted for the typical grains. For a list of gluten-free beers, please check out this informative website.

That still doesn't explain how or why the Glute-free beer found its way into a Seattle stadium. For some strange reason, I doubt you would find this kind of beer sold at Wrigley Field.

Cane Sugar Sodas

Over the weekend I talked to a friend who knew nothing about the history of cane sugar versus high fructose  corn syrup use in soda. The conversation came up when I lunged for a bottle of Pepsi Throwback at the grocery store and he rolled his eyes.  I explained that it contained actual cane sugar rather than HFCS and he scoffed.

Then he tried a sip of Pepsi Throwback. He didn't scoff after that! In fact, he went back inside to buy a bottle for himself.

Back in the day, all sodas used cane sugar as a sweetener.  Cane sugar is readily available in America from Hawaii and some growers in the tropical South, and it enjoys trade tariff protections, so it was an affordable source of sweet.  Then in the 1970s corn began to rise to dominance, and gradually soda manufacturers switched out HFCS for cane sugar.  

The story of this switch with regards to Coke is interesting. Coke released New Coke, which everyone agrees was an unmitigated disaster.  Then Coke replaced it with Coke Classic, which was the original Coke in the exact same formula, except that it had replaced the cane sugar with HFCS.  It's hard not to view the entire New Coke "debacle" as being deliberately engineered as a distraction for the switch from cane sugar to HFCS.

Sugar Coke still exists in a few forms, and those who have tried it swear that it is far preferable to "regular Coke."  I have yet to be able to track any down, so I can't attest to this.  Coke sweetened with cane sugar can be found in Mexico, and many people along the border make special trips in order to bring back cases of the stuff.  In some markets a special cane sugar version of Coke is sold for Passover, since the Passover rules prohibit grain-based foods.

Another throwback soda is a particular version of Dr Pepper which comes from a bottling plant in Dublin, Texas.  The Seattle Times has an awesome article on the Dublin bottling company, which exists as a "brand within a brand" within the larger Dr Pepper corporate structure.  The Dublin plant was the first Dr Pepper bottling plant in existence, and it holds a special (although limited) status within the legal strictures of the soda world.  The Dublin plant refused to make the switch to HFCS, and has been producing "real" soda all along.  Note to visitors: they have a limit of 20 cases (24 cans per case) per visitor!

Of course there are several other sodas which have been using real cane sugar all along.  Jones Soda is famous for never having used HFCS, and also famous for releasing weird seasonal flavors like Mown Grass (for Safeco Field) and Mashed Potatoes With Gravy (for Thanksgiving).  Aside from the freak flavors, I love root beer and cream soda (alone among cream sodas; every other cream soda in the world is retch-worthy).  I'm not a big fan of their cola flavor or their fruity flavors, but to each his own.

Hansen's Soda has also chugged along without HFCS, and they seem to be doing just fine.  I have always been a fan of their Mandarin Lime flavor, although again I find the cola flavor a little lacking.

Making Your Own Fruit Wine

This has been a prime year for home canning and preservation - aside from anecdotal evidence (everyone I know is canning stuff), I recently read that the sales of Ball glass mason jars is up 30% this year over last!  Now that the growing season is coming to an end, the transition into fall has brought a predictable transition in food preservation as well.  It's time to make fruit wine!

Elderberry and blackberry wine are the fruit wines most people are familiar with.  But you can make fruit wine out of any fruit (literally any - there is a winery in Hawaii which is famous for producing pineapple wine).  Traditionally the softer fruits like cherries and plums tended to be made into fruit wines more often, because it was the best way to preserve these tender fruits in the era before freezers and electricity were invented.

By the way, it is legal to make your own wine at home in America.  In 1978 the US Government legalized home winemaking, with volume restrictions.  A household with one adult may produce up to 100 gallons of wine per year.  A household with two adults may produce up to 200 gallons per year.  Obviously you are not allowed to sell the wine, or to give it to underage minors.

(The difference between wine and moonshine is that wine and beer are fermented homemade alcoholic beverages.  Moonshine and its ilk are distilled homemade alcoholic beverages.  Winemaking and homebrewing beer is okay.  Distilling alcoholic beverages using a still?  Not okay.)

Fruit wine has a lesser reputation compared to "real wine," partly because we have become a culture of wine snobs.  This SF Gate article on fruit wines refers to "grandpa's wine."  But it must be admitted that fruit wine tends to be sticky sweet, and can have a distinctive cough syrup overtones.  Many home winemakers drink their wines more like a port or a sherry - in a small glass, as an aperitif or an after-meal dessert.

To make your own fruit wine, you will need a lot (a LOT) of fruit, a fair amount of sugar (2-5 pounds), a sterile container (this can be a plastic bucket) for the first fermentation, a serious container like a carboy with a fermentation lock for the second fermentation, and (eventually) wine bottles and corks.

The basic process is:

1.    Cook down all of the ingredients on the stovetop into a syrup.
2.    Pour into the first sterile container, for the first fermentation, until most of the major bubbling has subsided.  This process takes a few days.
3.    Strain it and decant into a carboy with a fermentation lock and set it somewhere dark for the second fermentation.  This takes six months to a year.
4.    Once it's finished, pour the wine into bottles and cork them (this is called "racking").

The Herbwife's Kitchen has a basic overview of her elderberry wine recipe, which is a great overview of the home fruit wine-making process.  Jack Keller's winemaking website is one of the better in-depth internet resources for home winemaking (scroll down past all the bits and bobs on the main page to get to the meaty content).

The Sangria Police

Does a fellow party-goer have the right to limit the alcohol consumption of a total stranger at an open bar? I think not.

A friend of a friend recently had his 40th birthday in a fricking cool theater in Seattle. He rented the theater, provided the booze, and everybody brought food for the potluck. Fortunately, many of the guests were from Mexico, so it is safe to say that the food absolutely rocked the house. The booze and music weren't bad either.

Three hours into the night I was into my third glass of Sangria when the Sangria Police came to arrest me and tried to take my "drinking license away."

"Take it easy."

"What?"

I said, "Take it easy. Leave some for the rest of us."

Not without reason, I got a little pissed (and by pissed I do not mean the UK version as in drunk, but the Americanized "pissed" as in aggravated).  I couldn't help it- my face turned into a  sneer.

"Would you like me to pour some back?"

"Up to you." His face puckered up into pure disdain for me.

I poured approximately one-tenth of my glass of sangria back into the large pot (that still had enough for more than ten or twelve glasses left) and went to complain to my friends. Seriously, WTF? No one complained about the people standing by the only keg shoveling cup after cup down their throat, and no one complained that the expensive tequila was getting drunk because this was a party.

And three glasses was not a lot. I was not the only Sangria drinker at the party, just the only one to get busted for my "gluttonous" consumption.

In the same manner, I noticed that some people were eating more than their fair share of the considerably better tasting food. Would that give me the right to be the Glutton Police? "Excuse me, ma'am, you have eaten two helpings of the Mole, when I had only had one." WTF? Somehow, I don't think this would go over that well.

I asked the birthday boy his opinion on the manner. Being a few shots into the tequila, he didn't exactly know how to respond to me, but also didn't seem to have a problem with it.

I would like to know if I was the jackass for drinking three glasses of sangria at a party or if the policia should have had his ass kicked. And, by ass-kicking, I mean an ass-kicking with words and not violence, which I don't support. Or  was I the jack-ass for drinking my way through the sangria to begin with? Somehow, I don't think so.

Slim’s Last Chance: Seattle, Washington

It’s been a while since I’ve written for Good Drinking.  But this next bar really got my wheels turning again and made me want to write another review that may in fact help someone in the Seattle area select a bar that strikes their fancy and enjoy a great night out with friends.  The bar is Slim’s Last Chance, commonly referred to as The Last Chance.  It’s located on 1st Avenue South in Seattle’s industrial neighborhood.  The location doesn’t really do much for its appeal, except for the fact that the bar itself is a bit out of the way which does a lot to keep those away who do not truly appreciate the atmosphere and attitude of a southern-style establishment.

At Slim’s you’ll find yourself in a place straight out of Texas.  It’s got Americana of all kinds on the walls, old school country music blaring from its speakers, and more than a few tattooed bikers and southerners hanging around its wooden walls and doorways.  It’s not the same kitschy, soul-less Americana that you’ll find nailed to the walls of Applebee’s or Red Robin, but the kind you’d expect to see in a gas station in Louisiana or in a cabin on the Rio Grande.  Don’t let the place fool you, it’s not a cowboy or biker bar per se, it’s a southern bar with attitude, a location where friends and family can feel right at home among like-minded patrons from all walks of life.

Most of the drink specials involve peaches and/or whisky.  They have a fully-stocked bar but at Slim’s you certainly won’t find any of the frat boys and party girls that frequent the bars in Pioneer Square and Belltown.  It’s more of a low-key bar but the tenders and wait staff have that special touch of southern hospitality that goes a long way when it’s time to consider leaving a tip.  I’ve never had any issues with service or quality of food or drinks at Slim’s.  They even serve sweet tea for those people who are not looking to consume anything containing alcohol.

Slim’s is not only a bar but a chili mecca as well.  They offer more than a dozen different chili dishes and varieties.  It’s a food that goes well with alcohol consumption, but it certainly doesn’t help the ensuing hangover that often occurs the next day after a night of heavy drinking.  The Kobe beef chilidog comes on a Texas-sized plate with what feels like a few pounds of chili and cheese.  This little nugget is sure to help sop up the alcohol entering your system as the night drags on, given the fact that it likely contains over 4000 calories.

I would recommend Slim’s to anyone looking for a change of pace.  The bar is located about five minutes from downtown Seattle and offers something most bars in the city do not: real attitude and soul.  The next time you’re looking for a unique bar experience check out Slim’s Last Chance on First Ave.

Pages